Public:Competitive Environment: Difference between revisions

From Wiki Furtherium
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{Biz Page Template}
==Competition environment categories==
Teaser
{{further|1=[https://community.furtherium.com/t/competitive-landscape-furtherium-advantage/82/2 Competitive landscape]],|2=|3=|4=|5=|6=|7=|8=|9=|10=}}
<nowiki>''Main article: [[Public:1]]''. ''FAQ page: [[Public:2]]''</nowiki>


== Traction ==
=== 1. are solving the same problem ===
 
1. [https://wiki.furtherium.com/wiki/Public:ARHUDFM_FAQ#how_it's_similar_to_the_competitors'_products Microsoft IVAS] - poorly suited for military use:
* glowing screen
* short battery life
* many cables on the body and head (there should be no cables at all, it is dangerous)
* low FOV
* poor image contrast
* conflict of vergence and accommodation
* lens fogging problem
* passive cooling problem
* problem of fatigue
* few functions
* problem of the price ($55,000 for one)
 
2. [https://wiki.furtherium.com/wiki/Public:ARHUDFM_FAQ#how_it's_similar_to_the_competitors'_products L3Harris ENVG-B]
* analog device
* glowing screen
* very low FOV
* low magnification coef. (3x)
* poor image contrast
* problem of fatigue
* very few functions
* problem of the price ($25,490 for one)
 
3. [https://wiki.furtherium.com/wiki/Public:ARHUDFM_FAQ#how_it's_similar_to_the_competitors'_products SMASH]
* rifle mount only (not using Head-Up Display)
* very low FOV
* low magnification coef. (4x)
* visible laser range finder
* very few functions
 
3. [https://wiki.furtherium.com/wiki/Public:ARHUDFM_FAQ#how_it's_similar_to_the_competitors'_products Red6]
* L-STE (Live-Synthetic Terrain Environment) only
 
4. C5ISR CCDC (DEVCOM) - ''there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words''
 
5. DARPA - ''there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words''
 
6. Elbit Systems - ''there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words''
 
7. Airbus Defense - ''there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words''
 
=== 2. are using similar technologies ===
 
1. [https://www.dauntlessxr.com/ Dauntless XR]
2. [https://letinar.com/ LetinAR]
3. [https://www.vuzix.com/ Vuzix]
4. [https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2020/10/30/envg-psq-20/ Nicholas C]
5. [https://www.technifexxr.com/ Technifex XR]
6. [https://www.eolianvr.com/ EolianVR]
 
=== 3. are more than 10% alike ===
 
1. Unknown
 
=== 4. are non-competitors ===
 
1. Meta Quest 3, Meta Quest Pro
2. Apple Vision Pro
3. PlayStation VR 2 (PSVR 2)
4. HP Reverb G2
5. Valve Index VR kit
6. Bigscreen Beyound
7. HTC Vive Pro 2
 
==Traction==
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" overflow:auto;">
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" overflow:auto;">
<div style="font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;">What are the key differentiated features of your product or service?</div>
<div style="font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;">What are the key differentiated features of your product or service?</div>
Line 10: Line 75:


</div></div>
</div></div>
== Strategy ==
==Strategy==
''Main article: [[]]''
''Main article: [[]]''
=== Strengths ===
=== Strengths ===
Line 16: Line 81:
=== Opportunities ===
=== Opportunities ===
=== Threats ===
=== Threats ===
== Competitive Advantages ==
==Competitive Advantages==
== Plan ==
==Plan==
''Main article: [[]]''
''Main article: [[]]''
Table: Specific | Measurable | Achieveable | Realistic | Time-related  
Table: Specific | Measurable | Achieveable | Realistic | Time-related  
== Partners ==
==Partners==
=== New partners ===
=== New partners ===
=== Existing partners ===
=== Existing partners ===
== Fixing weaknesses ==
==Fixing weaknesses==


== Areas of research ==
==Areas of research==
* [https://www.futuresightar.com/ Future Sight AR] or [https://www.dauntlessxr.com/ Dauntless XR]
*[https://www.futuresightar.com/ Future Sight AR] or [https://www.dauntlessxr.com/ Dauntless XR]
* [https://holographica.space/articles/microsoft-hololens-10-6983/ How HoloLense is designed]
*[https://holographica.space/articles/microsoft-hololens-10-6983/ How HoloLense is designed]
* [https://letinar.com/ LetinAR]
*[https://letinar.com/ LetinAR]
* [https://www.vuzix.com/ Vuzix]
*[https://www.vuzix.com/ Vuzix]
* [https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2020/10/30/envg-psq-20/ Nicholas C], Steadicam Gun Operator, Night Vision & Thermal Aficionado, Flashlight/Laser Enthusiast, USPSA competitor. Any questions please email him at nicholas.c@staff.thefirearmblog.com
*[https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2020/10/30/envg-psq-20/ Nicholas C], Steadicam Gun Operator, Night Vision & Thermal Aficionado, Flashlight/Laser Enthusiast, USPSA competitor. Any questions please email him at nicholas.c@staff.thefirearmblog.com
* [https://www.technifexxr.com/ Technifex XR]
*[https://www.technifexxr.com/ Technifex XR]
* [https://www.eolianvr.com/ EolianVR]
*[https://www.eolianvr.com/ EolianVR]


=== Situational Awareness ===
===Situational Awareness===


* [https://www.esri.com/defense ArcGIS ESRI]
*[https://www.esri.com/defense ArcGIS ESRI]
* See more on https://vulcan-sof.com/login/ng2/search/organizations by tags
*See more on https://vulcan-sof.com/login/ng2/search/organizations by tags


== Related fields ==
==Related fields==
== Future ideas ==
==Future ideas==
== Further reading ==
==Further reading==
== See also ==
==See also==
{{See Also ARHUDFM}}
{{See Also ARHUDFM}}


Additional:
Additional:
# [[Augmented Reality Technologies]]
#[[Augmented Reality Technologies]]
# [[Head Up Display]]
#[[Head Up Display]]


== References ==
==References==
== External links ==
==External links==


[[Category:ARHUDFM]]
[[Category:ARHUDFM]]

Revision as of 15:55, 5 November 2023

Competition environment categories

redirect Further information: Competitive landscape],

1. are solving the same problem

1. Microsoft IVAS - poorly suited for military use:

  • glowing screen
  • short battery life
  • many cables on the body and head (there should be no cables at all, it is dangerous)
  • low FOV
  • poor image contrast
  • conflict of vergence and accommodation
  • lens fogging problem
  • passive cooling problem
  • problem of fatigue
  • few functions
  • problem of the price ($55,000 for one)

2. L3Harris ENVG-B

  • analog device
  • glowing screen
  • very low FOV
  • low magnification coef. (3x)
  • poor image contrast
  • problem of fatigue
  • very few functions
  • problem of the price ($25,490 for one)

3. SMASH

  • rifle mount only (not using Head-Up Display)
  • very low FOV
  • low magnification coef. (4x)
  • visible laser range finder
  • very few functions

3. Red6

  • L-STE (Live-Synthetic Terrain Environment) only

4. C5ISR CCDC (DEVCOM) - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words

5. DARPA - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words

6. Elbit Systems - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words

7. Airbus Defense - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words

2. are using similar technologies

1. Dauntless XR 2. LetinAR 3. Vuzix 4. Nicholas C 5. Technifex XR 6. EolianVR

3. are more than 10% alike

1. Unknown

4. are non-competitors

1. Meta Quest 3, Meta Quest Pro 2. Apple Vision Pro 3. PlayStation VR 2 (PSVR 2) 4. HP Reverb G2 5. Valve Index VR kit 6. Bigscreen Beyound 7. HTC Vive Pro 2

Traction

What are the key differentiated features of your product or service?

The product is so different.

Strategy

Main article: [[]] === Strengths === === Weaknesses === === Opportunities === === Threats ===

Competitive Advantages

Plan

Main article: [[]] Table: Specific | Measurable | Achieveable | Realistic | Time-related

Partners

=== New partners === === Existing partners ===

Fixing weaknesses

Areas of research

Situational Awareness

Related fields

Future ideas

Further reading

See also

Public External Sections: Public Wiki Sections: Public Wiki Sections: Not-Public Wiki Sections:

Note: Unless otherwise stated, whenever the masculine gender is used, both men and women are included.


Additional:

  1. Augmented Reality Technologies
  2. Head Up Display

References

External links