Public:Competitive Environment: Difference between revisions
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{further|1=[https://community.furtherium.com/t/competitive-landscape-furtherium-advantage/82/2 Competitive landscape]],|2=|3=|4=|5=|6=|7=|8=|9=|10=}} | {{further|1=[https://community.furtherium.com/t/competitive-landscape-furtherium-advantage/82/2 Competitive landscape]],|2=|3=|4=|5=|6=|7=|8=|9=|10=}} | ||
=== 1. are solving the same problem === | ===1. are solving the same problem=== | ||
1. [https://wiki.furtherium.com/wiki/Public:ARHUDFM_FAQ#how_it's_similar_to_the_competitors'_products Microsoft IVAS] - poorly suited for military use: | 1. [https://wiki.furtherium.com/wiki/Public:ARHUDFM_FAQ#how_it's_similar_to_the_competitors'_products Microsoft IVAS] - poorly suited for military use: | ||
* glowing screen | *glowing screen | ||
* short battery life | *short battery life | ||
* many cables on the body and head (there should be no cables at all, it is dangerous) | *many cables on the body and head (there should be no cables at all, it is dangerous) | ||
* low FOV | *low FOV | ||
* poor image contrast | *poor image contrast | ||
* conflict of vergence and accommodation | *conflict of vergence and accommodation | ||
* lens fogging problem | *lens fogging problem | ||
* passive cooling problem | *passive cooling problem | ||
* problem of fatigue | *problem of fatigue | ||
* few functions | *few functions | ||
* problem of the price ($55,000 for one) | *problem of the price ($55,000 for one) | ||
2. [https://wiki.furtherium.com/wiki/Public:ARHUDFM_FAQ#how_it's_similar_to_the_competitors'_products L3Harris ENVG-B] | 2. [https://wiki.furtherium.com/wiki/Public:ARHUDFM_FAQ#how_it's_similar_to_the_competitors'_products L3Harris ENVG-B] | ||
* analog device | *analog device | ||
* glowing screen | *glowing screen | ||
* very low FOV | *very low FOV | ||
* low magnification coef. (3x) | *low magnification coef. (3x) | ||
* poor image contrast | *poor image contrast | ||
* problem of fatigue | *problem of fatigue | ||
* very few functions | *very few functions | ||
* problem of the price ($25,490 for one) | *problem of the price ($25,490 for one) | ||
3. [https://wiki.furtherium.com/wiki/Public:ARHUDFM_FAQ#how_it's_similar_to_the_competitors'_products SMASH] | 3. [https://wiki.furtherium.com/wiki/Public:ARHUDFM_FAQ#how_it's_similar_to_the_competitors'_products SMASH] | ||
* rifle mount only (not using Head-Up Display) | *rifle mount only (not using Head-Up Display) | ||
* very low FOV | *very low FOV | ||
* low magnification coef. (4x) | *low magnification coef. (4x) | ||
* visible laser range finder | *visible laser range finder | ||
* very few functions | *very few functions | ||
3. [https://wiki.furtherium.com/wiki/Public:ARHUDFM_FAQ#how_it's_similar_to_the_competitors'_products Red6] | 3. [https://wiki.furtherium.com/wiki/Public:ARHUDFM_FAQ#how_it's_similar_to_the_competitors'_products Red6] | ||
* L-STE (Live-Synthetic Terrain Environment) only | *L-STE (Live-Synthetic Terrain Environment) only | ||
4. C5ISR CCDC (DEVCOM) - ''there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words'' | 4. C5ISR CCDC (DEVCOM) - ''there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words'' | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
7. Airbus Defense - ''there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words'' | 7. Airbus Defense - ''there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words'' | ||
=== 2. are using similar technologies === | ===2. are using similar technologies=== | ||
1. [https://www.dauntlessxr.com/ Dauntless XR] | 1. [https://www.dauntlessxr.com/ Dauntless XR] | ||
2. [https://letinar.com/ LetinAR] | 2. [https://letinar.com/ LetinAR] | ||
3. [https://www.vuzix.com/ Vuzix] | 3. [https://www.vuzix.com/ Vuzix] | ||
4. [https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2020/10/30/envg-psq-20/ Nicholas C] | 4. [https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2020/10/30/envg-psq-20/ Nicholas C] | ||
5. [https://www.technifexxr.com/ Technifex XR] | 5. [https://www.technifexxr.com/ Technifex XR] | ||
6. [https://www.eolianvr.com/ EolianVR] | 6. [https://www.eolianvr.com/ EolianVR] | ||
=== 3. are more than 10% alike === | ===3. are more than 10% alike=== | ||
1. Unknown | 1. Unknown | ||
=== 4. are non-competitors === | ===4. are non-competitors=== | ||
1. Meta Quest 3, Meta Quest Pro | 1. Meta Quest 3, Meta Quest Pro | ||
2. Apple Vision Pro | 2. Apple Vision Pro | ||
3. PlayStation VR 2 (PSVR 2) | 3. PlayStation VR 2 (PSVR 2) | ||
4. HP Reverb G2 | 4. HP Reverb G2 | ||
5. Valve Index VR kit | 5. Valve Index VR kit | ||
6. Bigscreen Beyound | 6. Bigscreen Beyound | ||
7. HTC Vive Pro 2 | 7. HTC Vive Pro 2 | ||
Revision as of 15:56, 5 November 2023
Competition environment categories
→redirect Further information: Competitive landscape],
1. are solving the same problem
1. Microsoft IVAS - poorly suited for military use:
- glowing screen
- short battery life
- many cables on the body and head (there should be no cables at all, it is dangerous)
- low FOV
- poor image contrast
- conflict of vergence and accommodation
- lens fogging problem
- passive cooling problem
- problem of fatigue
- few functions
- problem of the price ($55,000 for one)
- analog device
- glowing screen
- very low FOV
- low magnification coef. (3x)
- poor image contrast
- problem of fatigue
- very few functions
- problem of the price ($25,490 for one)
3. SMASH
- rifle mount only (not using Head-Up Display)
- very low FOV
- low magnification coef. (4x)
- visible laser range finder
- very few functions
3. Red6
- L-STE (Live-Synthetic Terrain Environment) only
4. C5ISR CCDC (DEVCOM) - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words
5. DARPA - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words
6. Elbit Systems - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words
7. Airbus Defense - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words
2. are using similar technologies
1. Dauntless XR
2. LetinAR
3. Vuzix
4. Nicholas C
5. Technifex XR
6. EolianVR
3. are more than 10% alike
1. Unknown
4. are non-competitors
1. Meta Quest 3, Meta Quest Pro
2. Apple Vision Pro
3. PlayStation VR 2 (PSVR 2)
4. HP Reverb G2
5. Valve Index VR kit
6. Bigscreen Beyound
7. HTC Vive Pro 2
Traction
The product is so different.
Strategy
Main article: [[]] === Strengths === === Weaknesses === === Opportunities === === Threats ===
Competitive Advantages
Plan
Main article: [[]] Table: Specific | Measurable | Achieveable | Realistic | Time-related
Partners
=== New partners === === Existing partners ===
Fixing weaknesses
Areas of research
- Future Sight AR or Dauntless XR
- How HoloLense is designed
- LetinAR
- Vuzix
- Nicholas C, Steadicam Gun Operator, Night Vision & Thermal Aficionado, Flashlight/Laser Enthusiast, USPSA competitor. Any questions please email him at nicholas.c@staff.thefirearmblog.com
- Technifex XR
- EolianVR
Situational Awareness
- ArcGIS ESRI
- See more on https://vulcan-sof.com/login/ng2/search/organizations by tags
Related fields
Future ideas
Further reading
See also
Public External Sections: | Public Wiki Sections: | Public Wiki Sections: | Not-Public Wiki Sections: |
---|---|---|---|
Note: Unless otherwise stated, whenever the masculine gender is used, both men and women are included.
Additional: