Public:Competitive Environment: Difference between revisions

From Wiki Furtherium
Line 34: Line 34:
*very few functions
*very few functions


3. [https://wiki.furtherium.com/wiki/Public:ARHUDFM_FAQ#how_it's_similar_to_the_competitors'_products Red6]
3. [https://www.ara.com/arc4/ ARC4]
 
* see more
 
4. [https://wiki.furtherium.com/wiki/Public:ARHUDFM_FAQ#how_it's_similar_to_the_competitors'_products Red6]
*L-STE (Live-Synthetic Terrain Environment) only
*L-STE (Live-Synthetic Terrain Environment) only


4. C5ISR CCDC (DEVCOM) - ''there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words''
5. C5ISR CCDC (DEVCOM) - ''there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words''


5. DARPA - ''there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words''
6. DARPA - ''there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words''


6. Elbit Systems - ''there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words''
7. Elbit Systems - ''there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words''


7. Airbus Defense - ''there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words''
8. Airbus Defense - ''there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words''


===2. are using similar technologies===
===2. are using similar technologies===

Revision as of 17:54, 20 November 2023

Competition environment categories

redirect Further information: Competitive landscape],

1. are solving the same problem

1. Microsoft IVAS - poorly suited for military use:

  • glowing screen
  • short battery life
  • many cables on the body and head (there should be no cables at all, it is dangerous)
  • low FOV
  • poor image contrast
  • conflict of vergence and accommodation
  • lens fogging problem
  • passive cooling problem
  • problem of fatigue
  • few functions
  • problem of the price ($55,000 for one)

2. L3Harris ENVG-B

  • analog device
  • glowing screen
  • very low FOV
  • low magnification coef. (3x)
  • poor image contrast
  • problem of fatigue
  • very few functions
  • problem of the price ($25,490 for one)

3. SMASH

  • rifle mount only (not using Head-Up Display)
  • very low FOV
  • low magnification coef. (4x)
  • visible laser range finder
  • very few functions

3. ARC4

  • see more

4. Red6

  • L-STE (Live-Synthetic Terrain Environment) only

5. C5ISR CCDC (DEVCOM) - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words

6. DARPA - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words

7. Elbit Systems - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words

8. Airbus Defense - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words

2. are using similar technologies

1. Dauntless XR

2. LetinAR

3. Vuzix

4. Nicholas C

5. Technifex XR

6. EolianVR

3. are more than 10% alike

1. Unknown

4. are non-competitors

1. Meta Quest 3, Meta Quest Pro

2. Apple Vision Pro

3. PlayStation VR 2 (PSVR 2)

4. HP Reverb G2

5. Valve Index VR kit

6. Bigscreen Beyound

7. HTC Vive Pro 2

Traction

What are the key differentiated features of your product or service?

The product is so different.

Strategy

Main article: [[]] === Strengths === === Weaknesses === === Opportunities === === Threats ===

Competitive Advantages

Plan

Main article: [[]] Table: Specific | Measurable | Achieveable | Realistic | Time-related

Partners

=== New partners === === Existing partners ===

Fixing weaknesses

Areas of research

Situational Awareness

Related fields

Future ideas

Further reading

See also

Public External Sections: Public Wiki Sections: Public Wiki Sections: Not-Public Wiki Sections:

Note: Unless otherwise stated, whenever the masculine gender is used, both men and women are included.


Additional:

  1. Augmented Reality Technologies
  2. Head Up Display

References

External links