Public:Competitive Environment: Difference between revisions

From Wiki Furtherium
m (Basil moved page Competitive Environment to Public:Competitive Environment without leaving a redirect)
Line 87: Line 87:
==Traction==
==Traction==
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" overflow:auto;">
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" overflow:auto;">
<div style="font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;">What are the key differentiated features of your product or service?</div>
<div style="font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;">Microsoft IVAS</div>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
The product is so different.
...


</div></div>
</div></div>
==Strategy==
==Strategy==
''Main article: [[]]''
 
=== Strengths ===
=== Strengths ===
=== Weaknesses ===
 
=== Opportunities ===
=== Weaknesses ===
=== Threats ===
 
==Competitive Advantages==
=== Opportunities ===
 
=== Threats ===
 
== Competitive Advantages ==
 
==Plan==
==Plan==
''Main article: [[]]''
Table: Specific | Measurable | Achieveable | Realistic | Time-related  
Table: Specific | Measurable | Achieveable | Realistic | Time-related  
==Partners==
==Partners==
=== New partners ===
 
=== Existing partners ===
=== New partners ===
 
=== Existing partners ===
 
==Fixing weaknesses==
==Fixing weaknesses==



Revision as of 19:20, 6 December 2023

Competition environment categories

redirect Further information: Competitive landscape],

1. are solving the same problem

1. Microsoft IVAS - poorly suited for military use:

  • glowing screen
  • short battery life
  • many cables on the body and head (there should be no cables at all, it is dangerous)
  • low FOV
  • poor image contrast
  • conflict of vergence and accommodation
  • lens fogging problem
  • passive cooling problem
  • problem of fatigue
  • few functions
  • problem of the price ($55,000 for one)

2. L3Harris ENVG-B

  • analog device
  • glowing screen
  • very low FOV
  • low magnification coef. (3x)
  • poor image contrast
  • problem of fatigue
  • very few functions
  • problem of the price ($25,490 for one)

3. SMASH

  • rifle mount only (not using Head-Up Display)
  • very low FOV
  • low magnification coef. (4x)
  • visible laser range finder
  • very few functions

3. ARC4

  • see more

4. Red6

  • L-STE (Live-Synthetic Terrain Environment) only

5. C5ISR CCDC (DEVCOM) - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words

6. DARPA - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words

7. Elbit Systems - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words

8. Airbus Defense - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words

9. Future Soldier Worldwide Programs (50+)

2. are using similar technologies

1. Dauntless XR

2. LetinAR

3. Vuzix

4. Nicholas C

5. Technifex XR

6. EolianVR

3. are more than 10% alike

1. Unknown

4. are non-competitors

1. Meta Quest 3, Meta Quest Pro

2. Apple Vision Pro

3. PlayStation VR 2 (PSVR 2)

4. HP Reverb G2

5. Valve Index VR kit

6. Bigscreen Beyound

7. HTC Vive Pro 2

Traction

Microsoft IVAS

...

Strategy

Strengths

Weaknesses

Opportunities

Threats

Competitive Advantages

Plan

Table: Specific | Measurable | Achieveable | Realistic | Time-related

Partners

New partners

Existing partners

Fixing weaknesses

Areas of research

Situational Awareness

Related fields

Additional:

  1. Augmented Reality Technologies
  2. Head Up Display

Future ideas

Further reading

See also

Public External Sections: Public Wiki Sections: Public Wiki Sections: Not-Public Wiki Sections:

Note: Unless otherwise stated, whenever the masculine gender is used, both men and women are included.


References

External links