Public:Competitive Environment: Difference between revisions
m (Basil moved page Competitive Environment to Public:Competitive Environment without leaving a redirect) |
|||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
==Traction== | ==Traction== | ||
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" overflow:auto;"> | <div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" overflow:auto;"> | ||
<div style="font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;"> | <div style="font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;">Microsoft IVAS</div> | ||
<div class="mw-collapsible-content"> | <div class="mw-collapsible-content"> | ||
... | |||
</div></div> | </div></div> | ||
==Strategy== | ==Strategy== | ||
=== Strengths === | |||
=== Weaknesses === | |||
==Competitive Advantages== | === Opportunities === | ||
=== Threats === | |||
== Competitive Advantages == | |||
==Plan== | ==Plan== | ||
Table: Specific | Measurable | Achieveable | Realistic | Time-related | Table: Specific | Measurable | Achieveable | Realistic | Time-related | ||
==Partners== | ==Partners== | ||
=== New partners === | |||
=== Existing partners === | |||
==Fixing weaknesses== | ==Fixing weaknesses== | ||
Revision as of 19:20, 6 December 2023
Competition environment categories
→redirect Further information: Competitive landscape],
1. are solving the same problem
1. Microsoft IVAS - poorly suited for military use:
- glowing screen
- short battery life
- many cables on the body and head (there should be no cables at all, it is dangerous)
- low FOV
- poor image contrast
- conflict of vergence and accommodation
- lens fogging problem
- passive cooling problem
- problem of fatigue
- few functions
- problem of the price ($55,000 for one)
- analog device
- glowing screen
- very low FOV
- low magnification coef. (3x)
- poor image contrast
- problem of fatigue
- very few functions
- problem of the price ($25,490 for one)
3. SMASH
- rifle mount only (not using Head-Up Display)
- very low FOV
- low magnification coef. (4x)
- visible laser range finder
- very few functions
3. ARC4
- see more
4. Red6
- L-STE (Live-Synthetic Terrain Environment) only
5. C5ISR CCDC (DEVCOM) - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words
6. DARPA - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words
7. Elbit Systems - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words
8. Airbus Defense - there's no evidence for several years, perhaps just words
9. Future Soldier Worldwide Programs (50+)
2. are using similar technologies
1. Dauntless XR
2. LetinAR
3. Vuzix
4. Nicholas C
5. Technifex XR
6. EolianVR
3. are more than 10% alike
1. Unknown
4. are non-competitors
1. Meta Quest 3, Meta Quest Pro
2. Apple Vision Pro
3. PlayStation VR 2 (PSVR 2)
4. HP Reverb G2
5. Valve Index VR kit
6. Bigscreen Beyound
7. HTC Vive Pro 2
Traction
...
Strategy
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
Competitive Advantages
Plan
Table: Specific | Measurable | Achieveable | Realistic | Time-related
Partners
New partners
Existing partners
Fixing weaknesses
Areas of research
- Future Sight AR or Dauntless XR
- How HoloLense is designed
- LetinAR
- Vuzix
- Nicholas C, Steadicam Gun Operator, Night Vision & Thermal Aficionado, Flashlight/Laser Enthusiast, USPSA competitor. Any questions please email him at nicholas.c@staff.thefirearmblog.com
- Technifex XR
- EolianVR
Situational Awareness
- ArcGIS ESRI
- See more on https://vulcan-sof.com/login/ng2/search/organizations by tags
Related fields
Additional:
Future ideas
Further reading
See also
Public External Sections: | Public Wiki Sections: | Public Wiki Sections: | Not-Public Wiki Sections: |
---|---|---|---|
Note: Unless otherwise stated, whenever the masculine gender is used, both men and women are included.